Review: The Road

The Road tells the story of a father (Viggo Mortensen) and son (Kodi Smit-McPhee) wandering through a post-apocalyptic landscape where humans have been reduced to their basest survival instincts. The relationship between father and son represents the ability of humanity to endure in inhuman situations. Thus against a backdrop of hopelessness and cruelty, the father exorts his son to survive in order to “carry the fire”. One might describe the film as both beautiful and unremittingly bleak, yet these qualities, striking as they are, also indicate the shallowness of director John Hillcoat’s vision (and perhaps also Cormac McCarthy from whose novel the scenario is taken, though I have not read his work).

Take the colour palette. Hillcoat’s film is almost monochromatic in browns and greys. This colour scheme makes sense in the shots of exterior landscapes as we are to believe that the world is dying. But this becomes ridiculous in scenes set in the interior of a domestic house. Perhaps we are to think that the past owners of the house had hired an interior decorator and instructed them to decorate the house in brown and grey; to remove all books, paintings or toys with a hint of colour. What is more probable is that Hillcoat is less concerned with constructing a fully, realized and complex world than he is with maintaining an aesthetic of bleakness. Perhaps the film would have been more honest if Hillcoat was prepared to disrupt this aestheticised bleakness with the garish colours of a rundown McDonalds or the sound of Lady Gaga emitting from a found iPod on its last legs. (Though Hillcoat is not so above product placement that he wouldn’t let his protagonists stumble across a hidden stash of VitaminWater® Gossip Girl-style.)

But it is the construction of the Boy that rings most false in The Road. The Boy only exists as a sacred symbol of childhood purity. He is the one who takes seriously the idea of “carrying the fire”; he who is charitable towards the handful of harmless strangers that pass their way. Hillcoat would have us believe that the Boy tells us something about the ability of “goodness” to survive in inhuman conditions. But the Boy is only a projection of goodness, not a flesh and blood character. Rather than delve into how the Boy is shaped by the landscape, the culture of fear instilled in him by his father, the withering of his own body, Hillcoat depends on the Boy’s innate goodness to convince us of hope for humanity after the apocalypse.

Linda Manz in "Days of Heaven"

I much prefer the rage of Max from Where the Wild Things Are, an uncontrollable response to his shifting social world; or the face of Linda from Days of Heaven, plain and weathered from days in the field; or the snide put-downs of Laurent from Murmur of the Heart, his survival technique against his bourgeois upbringing. What is shared between these examples is that these on-screen children’s subjectivities are shaped by a complex world rather than exist as symbols of purity closed off from their environment. But where the filmmakers of The Road could really have found inspiration is in Elie Wiesel’s memoir Night. The similarities between Night and The Road are striking. Both are accounts of the relationship between a father and son enduring the unendurable and whose faith is tested by extreme, inhuman conditions. In Wiesel’s book he recounts with brutal honesty how he came to resent his father whose deteriorating health became a liability for him: “Immediately I felt ashamed of myself, ashamed forever.” He also recounts witnessing a father killing his son as they fight over scraps of bread. There are no scenes like this in The Road because the filmmakers naively believe in the transcendent bonds of family. The Road ends on a note of hope but all I could feel after watching it was indifference.

Brad Nguyen
Brad Nguyen is a co-editor of Screen Machine. He studied Cinema Studies at the University of Melbourne, was the film reviewer for Triple R Breakfasters and is currently based in Tokyo.

→ more articles by Brad Nguyen

6 Comments


  • Conall
    12/02/10 - 6:28 PM
    Reply

    It would be interesting to look more closely at depictions of children in the cinema; I’m sure there are dissertations on that topic. Other films that come to mind as attempts to represent children in their complexity, their intelligence, their difference, are Malle’s _Pretty Baby_ and Bogdanovich’s _Paper Moon_. One does I think have to take this dichotomy (between films that represent children as symbols and those that acknowledge their multiplicity and complexity) a step further, and say that in some cases this humanist vision of childhood as real, complex, intense, can itself be overdetermined, made into a myth – the humanist myth, rather than the religious myth of McCarthy. Such films hit us over the head with the humanity and complexity and unknowability of children, emphasizing how different they are from what we commonly think; and I wouldn’t say this is any less of a myth than what one finds in McCarthy’s book (have not seen this film yet, not very excited to really). For me the best visions of children in the cinema (aside from Days of Heaven, which you mention) are in the films of Kiarostami (particularly Where is My Friend’s Home and Life and Nothing More), and Godard&Miéville’s France/tour/détour/deux/enfants. These films show that understanding or coming to terms with the difference and irreconcilability of children is something that must be worked on, that children need to be listened to in their own words, that their ways of speaking and walking and living need to be registered in all their specificity; as impossible as it is to ever define or delimit the experience of “the child”, the process of working on this problem is itself the way to approach the problem of childhood, rather than to signify a particular totalizing vision of “the child”.


  • Conall
    12/02/10 - 11:01 PM
    Reply

    And, as for McCarthy, I think there’s something interesting in the Sadean repetitions and horrors of his earlier work, of which I only know a little, but this novel I wasn’t too impressed by. Total Pulitzer bait, IMHO.


  • Maggie
    14/02/10 - 12:16 PM
    Reply

    Closer to home, Glendyn Ivin’s “Last Ride” was a great film that depicted a completely dysfunctional, complex and no less loving relationship between father in son, running from the law together and surviving in awful conditions. By the end, all the father (Hugo Weaving) has taught the boy (Tom Russell) is how to float on his back (after having chucked his terrified son in the river a few times)…but I was more touched by this notion of a survival when things get tough than the sickly precious bullshit of ‘carrying the fire’ and ‘we’re the good guys’ platitudes of father and son in “The Road”.


    • Brad Nguyen
      15/02/10 - 7:38 PM

      I wasn’t really a fan of Last Ride myself. I found it to be a pretty stock retread of Australian cliches: masculinity crisis, the oppressive atmosphere of rural Australia etc.


  • Maggie
    16/02/10 - 3:17 PM
    Reply

    I was expecting Last Ride to be cliched, but didn’t think it was at all. Those things you mention were certainly themes, but not stock standard retreads.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

Leave a Reply