<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real happy for you: A conversation around Taylor Swift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/</link>
	<description>Film criticism and cultural commentary based out of Melbourne, Australia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karl Treister</title>
		<link>http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Treister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 06:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenmachine.tv/?p=1088#comment-949</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m longing for Taylor Swift&#039;s new CD. Feels like ages since her last one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m longing for Taylor Swift&#8217;s new CD. Feels like ages since her last one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conall</title>
		<link>http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Conall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenmachine.tv/?p=1088#comment-440</guid>
		<description>TS&#039;s use of cover versions of current chart hits at her concerts is interesting. It was funny at the concert I saw, she did Jesse McCartney&#039;s &quot;Leavin&#039;&quot;, obviously unaware that the song was not really a hit outside the US, and hardly anyone in the crowd knew what it was or recognized that it was a cover of a hit song... 

But I don&#039;t really think that this is indicative of any genre-crossing in Swift&#039;s work or in the presentation of her star-image - I think she chooses them because they&#039;re &quot;pop songs,&quot; songs whose melodies and lyrics she likes... she happens to be a young performer at a time when a certain vein of modern RnB is the default &quot;pop&quot; genre, so those are the songs she covers. I think rather than entering another genre in performing these songs, she is more trying to evacuate the songs of their generic specificity, revealing that lying behind the studio pyrotechnics and expensive videos of these hits are the timeless ingredients of &#039;good songwriting&#039; - heartfelt lyrics, sing-along-able melodies, familiar yet original chord progressions, all those clichés one finds in songwriting manuals... She&#039;s starting to do the same thing with the country genre in her more recent songs, maintaining certain generic conventions but evacuating much of their specificity, their territoriality. It is what people often refer to as &quot;selling out,&quot; but leaving aside the pejorative interpretation, it&#039;s interesting just to notice how such an act functions in a time of globalisation, and specifically in the internet era. 

We&#039;re forever being told that things like &#039;guilty pleasures,&#039; genre-territoriality, etc., have been rendered obsolete by the internet - it&#039;s so easy to just download a Taylor Swift song, so easy for a metalhead to watch a bunch of Raekwon videos on YouTube and learn about rap music, and in the end it all gets homogenized, filling up some space on the hard drive, listed alphabetically in the iTunes library. We don&#039;t need to be territorial in our tastes anymore, everything is so available that this restrictive discourse can be dispensed with and we can just listen to &#039;what we want&#039; to listen to - if one of our friends calls us a loser for listening to Artist X (who is too commercial, too weird, too uncool, too hipsterish, or whatever) it is the friend who in fact reveals him/herself to be uncool, to be living in the 90s, still so closed-off and monolithic... Swift&#039;s covers can be understood in this same context I think, willing us to free ourselves from the restrictions of personal taste and to just realize the goodness of everything, the universality of music... It&#039;s a move that is simultaneously very conservative and very contemporary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TS&#8217;s use of cover versions of current chart hits at her concerts is interesting. It was funny at the concert I saw, she did Jesse McCartney&#8217;s &#8220;Leavin&#8217;&#8221;, obviously unaware that the song was not really a hit outside the US, and hardly anyone in the crowd knew what it was or recognized that it was a cover of a hit song&#8230; </p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t really think that this is indicative of any genre-crossing in Swift&#8217;s work or in the presentation of her star-image &#8211; I think she chooses them because they&#8217;re &#8220;pop songs,&#8221; songs whose melodies and lyrics she likes&#8230; she happens to be a young performer at a time when a certain vein of modern RnB is the default &#8220;pop&#8221; genre, so those are the songs she covers. I think rather than entering another genre in performing these songs, she is more trying to evacuate the songs of their generic specificity, revealing that lying behind the studio pyrotechnics and expensive videos of these hits are the timeless ingredients of &#8216;good songwriting&#8217; &#8211; heartfelt lyrics, sing-along-able melodies, familiar yet original chord progressions, all those clichés one finds in songwriting manuals&#8230; She&#8217;s starting to do the same thing with the country genre in her more recent songs, maintaining certain generic conventions but evacuating much of their specificity, their territoriality. It is what people often refer to as &#8220;selling out,&#8221; but leaving aside the pejorative interpretation, it&#8217;s interesting just to notice how such an act functions in a time of globalisation, and specifically in the internet era. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re forever being told that things like &#8216;guilty pleasures,&#8217; genre-territoriality, etc., have been rendered obsolete by the internet &#8211; it&#8217;s so easy to just download a Taylor Swift song, so easy for a metalhead to watch a bunch of Raekwon videos on YouTube and learn about rap music, and in the end it all gets homogenized, filling up some space on the hard drive, listed alphabetically in the iTunes library. We don&#8217;t need to be territorial in our tastes anymore, everything is so available that this restrictive discourse can be dispensed with and we can just listen to &#8216;what we want&#8217; to listen to &#8211; if one of our friends calls us a loser for listening to Artist X (who is too commercial, too weird, too uncool, too hipsterish, or whatever) it is the friend who in fact reveals him/herself to be uncool, to be living in the 90s, still so closed-off and monolithic&#8230; Swift&#8217;s covers can be understood in this same context I think, willing us to free ourselves from the restrictions of personal taste and to just realize the goodness of everything, the universality of music&#8230; It&#8217;s a move that is simultaneously very conservative and very contemporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenmachine.tv/?p=1088#comment-439</guid>
		<description>So many things I love about this post: The analysis at the start, the gradual/haphazard devolution in language, Sam&#039;s insistence that &quot;You Belong With Me&quot; is timeless, breaking the fourth wall at the very end. So good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many things I love about this post: The analysis at the start, the gradual/haphazard devolution in language, Sam&#8217;s insistence that &#8220;You Belong With Me&#8221; is timeless, breaking the fourth wall at the very end. So good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robert Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robert Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenmachine.tv/?p=1088#comment-437</guid>
		<description>My head is spinning 

I can&#039;t really process it at the moment, so I&#039;m just going add more great moments in Swift-ian documentation. 

It&#039;s interesting, in the light of Kanyegate, that one of the celebrated points of the Taylor Swift &#039;narrative&#039;, besides her supposed authenticity, is her genre-crossing inclinations. To wit: her appropriation of Hip Hop and RnB. 

Thus:

Taylor Swift covering Beyonce&#039;s &#039;Irreplacable&#039;: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JTex90YoHk

Taylor Swift covering Eminem&#039;s &#039;Lose Yourself&#039;: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4WQPfMzK10

and covering Rihanna&#039;s &#039;Umbrella&#039;: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLpeeeraVJQ&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My head is spinning </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really process it at the moment, so I&#8217;m just going add more great moments in Swift-ian documentation. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting, in the light of Kanyegate, that one of the celebrated points of the Taylor Swift &#8216;narrative&#8217;, besides her supposed authenticity, is her genre-crossing inclinations. To wit: her appropriation of Hip Hop and RnB. </p>
<p>Thus:</p>
<p>Taylor Swift covering Beyonce&#8217;s &#8216;Irreplacable&#8217;: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JTex90YoHk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JTex90YoHk</a></p>
<p>Taylor Swift covering Eminem&#8217;s &#8216;Lose Yourself&#8217;: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4WQPfMzK10" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4WQPfMzK10</a></p>
<p>and covering Rihanna&#8217;s &#8216;Umbrella&#8217;: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLpeeeraVJQ&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLpeeeraVJQ&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.screenmachine.tv/2009/10/30/real-happy-for-you-a-conversation-around-taylor-swift/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenmachine.tv/?p=1088#comment-435</guid>
		<description>I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

